From Compliance Checks to Industry Change
Inspections may grab headlines, but lasting reform is driven by what follows: ongoing
monitoring, accountability and a culture of compliance
Approximately 94% of the UK’s top 50 contractors are registered with the voluntary Considerate
Constructors Scheme (CCS), a programme built on continuous monitoring, workforce
wellbeing, community engagement and accountability. The scheme includes more than R4.759
trillion (£219 billion) of construction activity annually and conducts over 8,000 monitoring visits
each year.
For the Building Industry Bargaining Council (BIBC), these figures highlight an important lesson
for South Africa’s building industry: meaningful reform is not achieved through inspections
alone, but through what happens afterwards.
The lessons are particularly relevant as both the United Kingdom and the Western Cape face
growing pressure to deliver more housing. Britain’s commitment to build 1.5 million new homes
and rising demand for development in the Western Cape underscore the importance of
maintaining strong labour, governance and compliance standards as construction activity
accelerates.
While compliance inspections often attract attention because of arrests, site stoppages or
enforcement action, the BIBC says their true value lies in driving long-term behavioural change
across the industry.
“Inspections are not the end of the process; they are the beginning,” says Danie Hattingh,
spokesperson for business at the BIBC.
“The objective is not simply to identify non-compliance, but to create a fair, sustainable and
accountable industry where employers compete on a level playing field and workers receive the
protections to which they are entitled. No employer should gain an advantage through labour
exploitation or non-compliance.”
As part of its statutory mandate, the BIBC conducts both courtesy visits and compliance
inspections across the Greater Cape Peninsula building industry.
Courtesy visits focus on education, stakeholder engagement and support, helping employers
understand employee benefits, regulatory requirements and available industry support. These
visits are conducted across active building sites within the Council’s jurisdiction.
Compliance inspections, meanwhile, may be triggered by employee complaints, whistle-blower
reports, internal audit findings and histories of recurring non-compliance or routine monitoring
programmes.
Importantly, inspections represent only the first step in a structured compliance process.
Following a compliance inspection, a detailed site report is issued identifying areas of concern
and corrective actions required. Where issues remain unresolved, employers may receive
formal compliance orders with deadlines for voluntary compliance.
Continued non-compliance can ultimately lead to dispute resolution processes through the
CCMA and, where necessary, further legal action.
“The real impact of inspections occurs after the site visit,” says Hattingh. “Ongoing monitoring
allows us to track whether corrective action has been taken, identify repeat patterns of non
compliance and ensure employers meet their obligations over time.”
A key area of focus is pension and benefit compliance.
According to the BIBC, compliance investigations assess not only wage compliance, but also
whether employers are meeting their pension and employee benefit obligations.
“Pension and benefit contributions are not administrative formalities,” says Hattingh. “They are
essential protections that safeguard workers’ long-term financial security.”
The benefits extend beyond employees.
Consistent compliance monitoring prevents non-compliant employers from gaining an unfair
advantage and promotes stronger governance, accurate payroll practices and greater
transparency.
The BIBC says it is already seeing evidence that enforcement activity is influencing behaviour.
Contractors are increasingly seeking compliance guidance, improving employee registration
processes and strengthening internal controls, while developers are placing greater emphasis
on subcontractor vetting.
“Enforcement is driving greater professionalism and accountability,” says Hattingh. “More
companies now recognise that compliance is not simply a legal obligation; it is essential to
credibility, competitiveness and long-term sustainability.”
International best practice suggests that this approach can deliver broader industry benefits.
The UK’s CCS programme demonstrates how regular monitoring, independent assessments
and a commitment to workforce wellbeing, environmental responsibility and community
engagement can help raise standards across an entire sector. The scheme’s success shows
that accountability and continuous improvement can become embedded in industry culture
rather than being driven solely by enforcement.
For South Africa, Hattingh believes the opportunity extends beyond compliance alone.
“Success in building should not be measured only by projects completed on time and within
budget,” he says. “It should also be measured by how workers are treated, whether
communities benefit, and whether employers operate responsibly and ethically.”
The BIBC believes its role extends well beyond inspections and enforcement. Through
education, stakeholder engagement, dispute resolution and ongoing compliance support, the
Council aims to help build a more resilient, professional and sustainable building industry.
“Lasting reform happens when accountability becomes part of industry culture,” Hattingh
concludes. “Inspections may start the conversation, but continuous improvement is what
ultimately changes behaviour and strengthens the industry for everyone.”